In a statement written by Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly and given to the House of Commons on 30 June 2011, the UK government expressed its decision not to sign up to new laws governing the resolution of matrimonial property disputes.
The statement reads:
â€œThe Government have today decided not to opt in to the European Commissionâ€™s proposals on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships.
â€œThe Commissionâ€™s proposals aim to regulate jurisdiction and applicable law as they apply both to the daily management of the property of spouses and registered partners (which would include civil partnerships registered in the UK) and to how disputes relating to the distribution of assets in cross-border situations are handled following the ending of a coupleâ€™s relationship through divorce or dissolution of the partnership, separation or death.
â€œThe broad balance of opinion from the Governmentâ€™s consultation was that it would not be in the UKâ€™s interests to participate in these proposals. A number of difficulties were identified. First, the concept of a matrimonial property regime (or equivalent for civil partners) does not exist in the UK in the sense understood in most other member states. Currently our courts take a wide view of the capital resources available to the parties on divorce or dissolution (including maintenance). Many of these issues are not included in traditional matrimonial property regimes. If the UK was to opt in it would be more difficult for our courts to deal with all aspects of the financial provision of international couples on divorce or dissolution in cases which fall within the scope of these proposals.
â€œConcerns were raised about how the use of foreign law could drive up costs and complicate the resolution of disputes in the family courts and create uncertainty for third-parties who enter into a legal relationship with the couple. There was also considered to be uncertainty about the interaction with succession law.
â€œBoth the House of Lords European Union Select Committee and the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee have recommended the UK should not opt-in.â€
The rejection is not the only one of its kind in recent months. Other Government departments have released similar statements concerning the European Unionâ€™s uniformity proposals, including on non property related subjects such as renewable energy goals, demands to stop deep sea drilling after the Gulf of Mexico disaster, the EU maternity leave plan and, very recently (30 June), a proposed bank budget plan.
30th June 2011