A property dispute in the Scottish Borders has highlighted some of the complex legal challenges facing landowners when dealing with unauthorised camping on their land.
Three individuals calling themselves the “Kingdom of Kubala” have established a camp near Jedburgh, defying multiple eviction notices. The group consists of Kofi Offeh from Ghana, Jean Gasho from Zimbabwe, and Kaura Taylor from Texas, who have adopted royal titles and claim they are reclaiming ancestral lands.
The campers initially settled on private property but moved to council-owned land when faced with removal. Despite receiving a formal eviction notice with a set deadline, they remained at their campsite, continuing their daily activities undeterred.
Legal and financial challenges
The situation has created significant concerns for property owners throughout the region. One previous eviction action cost approximately £6,000, raising questions about who bears responsibility for such expenses when unauthorised camping occurs.
Local councillors have expressed frustration with the handling of the matter, particularly regarding the enforcement of historical trespassing laws. Some officials worry that the precedent could encourage similar situations, leaving landowners vulnerable to costly legal battles.
Police response
Police Scotland’s regional commander acknowledged the complexity of the situation, emphasising the need for a comprehensive solution rather than simply relocating the problem elsewhere. The force has faced criticism for not taking more decisive action, with some questioning why existing trespassing legislation isn’t being enforced more rigorously.
However, law enforcement officials stress that modern access rights legislation has created complications around historical trespassing laws, making enforcement more challenging than it might initially appear.
Broader implications
The case raises important questions about property rights, enforcement mechanisms, and the financial burden of dealing with unauthorised land use. For property owners, the situation demonstrates potential vulnerabilities in current legal protections and the costs associated with reclaiming their land.
The evolving nature of property law can lead to historical legislation intersecting with contemporary access rights, creating legal grey areas that can be difficult to navigate.
Scottish Borders Council has confirmed that legal proceedings are continuing, and that they are working to resolve the matter as efficiently as possible. Property owners need to understand their rights and the available legal remedies when facing unauthorised use of their land.
The outcome of this dispute may influence how similar situations are handled in the future, potentially affecting property owner protections and enforcement procedures.