{"id":5110,"date":"2013-05-08T12:02:19","date_gmt":"2013-05-08T11:02:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=5110"},"modified":"2016-10-13T16:25:30","modified_gmt":"2016-10-13T16:25:30","slug":"high-court-decides-important-defective-premises-act-1972-case-resulting-full-re-build-cost-liability","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=5110","title":{"rendered":"High Court decides on Important Defective Premises Act 1972 case \u00e2\u20ac\u201c resulting in full re-build cost liability"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b><i>Ref. Zennstrom v Moseley &amp; Wilks [2013] EWHC 288 (TCC)<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Following on from our consideration of when a home becomes a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=5114\">commercial leisure business in planning terms<\/a>, we look at when a family home becomes a business venture in the context of the Defective Premises Act 1972. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In the recent case referenced above, Ms Moseley and Ms Wilks found themselves as the Second and Third defendants (of a total of five being sued) in a case brought against them by the purchasers of their \u00c2\u00a31.1m home. Those purchasers had successfully bought the home in 2009 and by 2012 it was exhibiting such structural defects that it needed, in the opinion of the claimants and their advisors, complete demolition and rebuilding. Through subsequent litigation, the Zennstroms sought to claim damages from the previous owners under the Defective Premises Act 1972. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The grounds for this use of the 1972 Act <\/span><span style=\"color: #000000;\">were that the defendants had demolished and redeveloped their home in 2007, not with a view to creating a home for themselves, but for commercial reasons; to profit by selling it on. The defendants had bought the property for just \u00c2\u00a3360,000 in 2004 and sold the new structure for \u00c2\u00a31.1m in 2009. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The claimants referred to this section of the DPA 1972: <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><i>Section 1(4)(a) Act provides: <\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><i>&#8220;A person who-<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><i>(a) in the course of a business which consists of or includes providing or arranging for the provision of dwellings or installations in dwellings; or<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><i>(b)\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6..arranges for another to take on work for or in connection with the provision of a dwelling shall be treated for the purposes of this section as included among the persons who have taken on the work.&#8221;<\/i> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The argument was that the Defendants had acted in the course of business and were thus subject to the obligations in the Act to \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<i>see that the work which he takes on is done in a workmanlike or, as the case may be, professional manner, with proper materials and so that as regards that work the dwelling will be fit for habitation when completed<\/i>.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">By limiting the scope of the Act only to those operating in a commercial context, the intention was to allow purchasers of the property legal recourse to address a seriously, fundamentally structurally deficient property against those who created it. Through the Act, the purchaser can sue the Architect, Builder, Surveyor or Engineer and, in this case, the Architect, Builder and Engineer have all also been sued. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court in this case placed the burden of proof on the Claimants. It was for them to put forward a strong case that would both prove beyond the balance of probabilities that the vendors had decided at the time of rebuilding that they were doing so to sell and that they did not intend to occupy the home for anything more than a minimal period after completion, whilst they negotiated the sale. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Claimants subjected the Defendants themselves to what the Judge called a \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcsustained and forceful cross examination\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and attempts were made by the Claimants\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 representatives to convince the Court on a number of grounds of the Defendants intentions to build for profit. These included discussions of the Defendants\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 financial situation, including difficulties paying a single Architect\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s bill, discussion of the defendants\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 history of previous property purchases and of their choice of builder \u00e2\u20ac\u201c on which point it was suggested that he was chosen only because he provided the lowest quote. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In his conclusions, the Hon. Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart was entirely satisfied as to the honesty of the defendants and was convinced as to their motives in selling the house. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Reasons for this conclusion included:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">-\u00c2\u00a0 The property was lived in for approaching 15 months after construction was completed, longer than a \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcminimal period\u00e2\u20ac\u2122<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">-\u00c2\u00a0 The real reason for sale was because Ms Wilks was changing career (studying to become a hypno-therapist) and they could not afford the mortgage payments on just one salary<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">-\u00c2\u00a0 A number of witnesses attested to their intentions to live in the house<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">-\u00c2\u00a0 The number of individual features were included in the construction that were evidently not to maximise the potential for sale, but to suit the tastes of the incumbents. These included two kitchens, a bespoke bathroom, a bespoke cantilever front door and a top-down projector screen.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The case in this instance therefore went against the Claimants and the full judgement is available<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bailii.org\/cgi-bin\/markup.cgi?doc=\/ew\/cases\/EWHC\/TCC\/2013\/288.html&amp;query=zennstrom&amp;method=boolean\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Perhaps the most interesting part of the decision, however, was the Hon. Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart proposition that this was a matter of fact and degree to be assessed in each individual instance. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">On that basis, it could well be that in another instance where it is established that a homeowner has demolished and rebuilt a house and then sold it on, satisfying the conditions of a minimal time period in occupation and with the evident intention of turning a profit, that homeowner <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">could<\/span> fall under the auspices of the Defective Premises Act 1972. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Thus, although the defendants were rightly excused in this case, homeowners must beware that, if they choose to redevelop the whole of their house \u00e2\u20ac\u201c or potentially even just a subsidiary part &#8211; before resale, they may be held responsible for the quality of that redevelopment and, potentially, liable for expensive rebuilding or repair works. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Quality, therefore, is paramount and this case serves to reinforce the need for professional oversight on even small renovation projects and extension works.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/\">www.PropertySurveying.co.uk<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n<p>01\/05\/2013\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 SRJ\/LCB<b><br \/>\n<\/b><\/p>\n<p>[contact-form][contact-field label=&#8217;Email&#8217; type=&#8217;email&#8217; required=&#8217;1&#8217;\/][contact-field label=&#8217;I liked this article&#8217; type=&#8217;checkbox&#8217;\/][contact-field label=&#8217;I did not like this article&#8217; type=&#8217;checkbox&#8217;\/][contact-field label=&#8217;Comment&#8217; type=&#8217;textarea&#8217;\/][\/contact-form]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ref. Zennstrom v Moseley &amp; Wilks [2013] EWHC 288 (TCC) Following on from our consideration of when a home becomes a commercial leisure business in planning terms, we look at when a family home becomes a business venture in the context of the Defective Premises Act 1972. In the recent case referenced above, Ms Moseley &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=5110\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;High Court decides on Important Defective Premises Act 1972 case \u00e2\u20ac\u201c resulting in full re-build cost liability&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"folder":[],"class_list":["post-5110","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>High Court decides on Important Defective Premises Act 1972 case \u00e2\u20ac\u201c resulting in full re-build cost liability - Property Surveying NEWSLETTER<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=5110\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"High Court decides on Important Defective Premises Act 1972 case \u00e2\u20ac\u201c resulting in full re-build cost liability - Property Surveying NEWSLETTER\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ref. Zennstrom v Moseley &amp; Wilks [2013] EWHC 288 (TCC) Following on from our consideration of when a home becomes a commercial leisure business in planning terms, we look at when a family home becomes a business venture in the context of the Defective Premises Act 1972. In the recent case referenced above, Ms Moseley &hellip; Continue reading &quot;High Court decides on Important Defective Premises Act 1972 case \u00e2\u20ac\u201c resulting in full re-build cost liability&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=5110\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PropertySurveying\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-13T16:25:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/?page_id=5110\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/?page_id=5110\",\"name\":\"High Court decides on Important Defective Premises Act 1972 case \u00e2\u20ac\u201c resulting in full re-build cost liability - Property Surveying NEWSLETTER\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-05-08T11:02:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-13T16:25:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/?page_id=5110#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/?page_id=5110\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/?page_id=5110#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"High Court decides on Important Defective Premises Act 1972 case \u00e2\u20ac\u201c resulting in full re-build cost liability\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/\",\"name\":\"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER\",\"description\":\"The NEWSLETTER\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/cropped-property-surveying-logo-for-newsletter-body-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/cropped-property-surveying-logo-for-newsletter-body-1.png\",\"width\":240,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/PropertySurveying\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"High Court decides on Important Defective Premises Act 1972 case \u00e2\u20ac\u201c resulting in full re-build cost liability - Property Surveying NEWSLETTER","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=5110","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"High Court decides on Important Defective Premises Act 1972 case \u00e2\u20ac\u201c resulting in full re-build cost liability - Property Surveying NEWSLETTER","og_description":"Ref. Zennstrom v Moseley &amp; Wilks [2013] EWHC 288 (TCC) Following on from our consideration of when a home becomes a commercial leisure business in planning terms, we look at when a family home becomes a business venture in the context of the Defective Premises Act 1972. In the recent case referenced above, Ms Moseley &hellip; Continue reading \"High Court decides on Important Defective Premises Act 1972 case \u00e2\u20ac\u201c resulting in full re-build cost liability\"","og_url":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=5110","og_site_name":"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PropertySurveying","article_modified_time":"2016-10-13T16:25:30+00:00","twitter_misc":{"Estimated reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=5110","url":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=5110","name":"High Court decides on Important Defective Premises Act 1972 case \u00e2\u20ac\u201c resulting in full re-build cost liability - Property Surveying NEWSLETTER","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-05-08T11:02:19+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-13T16:25:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=5110#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=5110"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=5110#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"High Court decides on Important Defective Premises Act 1972 case \u00e2\u20ac\u201c resulting in full re-build cost liability"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/","name":"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER","description":"The NEWSLETTER","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/#organization","name":"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER","url":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/wp-content\/uploads\/cropped-property-surveying-logo-for-newsletter-body-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/wp-content\/uploads\/cropped-property-surveying-logo-for-newsletter-body-1.png","width":240,"height":50,"caption":"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PropertySurveying"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5110","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5110"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5110\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5110"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"folder","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ffolder&post=5110"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}