{"id":1028,"date":"2010-08-25T15:01:17","date_gmt":"2010-08-25T14:01:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=1028"},"modified":"2010-08-25T15:01:17","modified_gmt":"2010-08-25T14:01:17","slug":"property-landowners-and-occupiers-liability-and-duty-of-care-ruling-jonathan-harvey-v-plymouth-city-council","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=1028","title":{"rendered":"Property Landowners and Occupiers Liability and Duty of Care Ruling:  Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An important case has recently been heard by the Court of Appeal which has overturned an earlier ruling by the High Court.<\/p>\n<p>In the case <em>Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council<\/em> on 29 July 2010, in 2003 four students, including Mr Harvey who was 21 at the time, shared a taxi home after rugby and the traditional after-match occupations.\u00c2\u00a0 Upon arrival near the destination, three of them ran off in different directions,\u00c2\u00a0 leaving the fourth student to pay the taxi fare (as he had purportedly paid less than his share that evening).<\/p>\n<p>Mr Harvey ran across a grassed area and through a gap in the bushes. He\u00c2\u00a0 fell down a 5 metre drop onto a Tesco car park, being constructed of concrete \/ asphalt.\u00c2\u00a0 He sustained serious injuries.<\/p>\n<p>The land was owned by Plymouth City Council.\u00c2\u00a0 They had previously leased the land to Tesco and although the land was now back vested in the City Council, Tescos&#8217; landscaped the area and still maintained the area by cutting the grass.\u00c2\u00a0 The small chain link fence had been used and had been damaged so the fence still in situ became a trip hazard.\u00c2\u00a0 The Council&#8217;s Park&#8217;s Department was not aware that the land was owned by the Council.<\/p>\n<p>Harvey sued the Council as owner of the land alleging that it had failed to discharge the Duty of Care it owed him as a visitor under Section 2 of the Occupiers&#8217; Liability Act 1957.\u00c2\u00a0 Alternatively, if Mr Harvey was deemed a trespasser, he would sue under the Occupiers&#8217; Liability Act, 1984.<\/p>\n<p>The Council admitted it was the legal occupier of the land but denied that Harvey was a visitor.\u00c2\u00a0 They also denied that it had the requisite knowledge to owe a duty of care under the 1984 Act.\u00c2\u00a0 Eventually the claim under the 1984 Act was abandoned.<\/p>\n<p>The High Court ruled that the Council did have a duty of care.\u00c2\u00a0 Other youths had used the land for assorted purposes and, notwithstanding the fact that the Council did not know what these activities were, it still owed a Duty of Care to a visitor.\u00c2\u00a0 (The Court deemed that a Council should implicitly know what may be happening on its own land.)<\/p>\n<p>Having also decided that the actions of the claimant were youthful high spirits, the Court decided that the claimant was 75% responsible for his actions and the damages were therefore to be reduced accordingly.<\/p>\n<p>The Court of Appeal overruled the decision, saying that even if the Council should have foreseen what could have happened on their land, foresight was not the appropriate test and that the test should have been whether, under the 1957 Act, the Council had impliedly given its consent or licensed the use such as that put to it by the claimant.<\/p>\n<p>The Court of Appeal suggested that there was no reason to reach such a conclusion.\u00c2\u00a0 The Court wanted to know whether the use was a &#8220;normal recreational activity, carrying normal risks. &#8220;\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 This would imply that the owner of a piece of land, even if the public have access to it, does not owe a Duty of Care for any form of reckless activity, only for the consequences of &#8220;normal&#8221; activities.<\/p>\n<p>Harvey&#8217;s behaviour was deemed to go beyond the implied permission for general recreational activity and accordingly it was found that he was not a visitor and the Council owed him no Duty of Care under the 1957 Act.<\/p>\n<p>The implications for the owner of any land with open access is that a liability exists to those engaged in &#8220;normal&#8221; activity on the land that an occupier can be said to have, expressly or impliedly, consented to.\u00c2\u00a0 Then the Duty of Care to the individual would benefit from the enhanced protection afforded by the Occupiers&#8217; Liability Act 1957.<\/p>\n<p>The question of whether an activity is &#8220;normal&#8221; or not will be determined in each case on its merits; the Court of Appeal&#8217;s judgment in <em>Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council<\/em> has provided a case law example to indicate the limits of an occupier&#8217;s liability.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An important case has recently been heard by the Court of Appeal which has overturned an earlier ruling by the High Court. In the case Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council on 29 July 2010, in 2003 four students, including Mr Harvey who was 21 at the time, shared a taxi home after rugby and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=1028\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Property Landowners and Occupiers Liability and Duty of Care Ruling:  Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"folder":[],"class_list":["post-1028","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Property Landowners and Occupiers Liability and Duty of Care Ruling: Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council - Property Surveying NEWSLETTER<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=1028\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Property Landowners and Occupiers Liability and Duty of Care Ruling: Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council - Property Surveying NEWSLETTER\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"An important case has recently been heard by the Court of Appeal which has overturned an earlier ruling by the High Court. In the case Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council on 29 July 2010, in 2003 four students, including Mr Harvey who was 21 at the time, shared a taxi home after rugby and &hellip; Continue reading &quot;Property Landowners and Occupiers Liability and Duty of Care Ruling: Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=1028\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PropertySurveying\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/?page_id=1028\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/?page_id=1028\",\"name\":\"Property Landowners and Occupiers Liability and Duty of Care Ruling: Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council - Property Surveying NEWSLETTER\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-25T14:01:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/?page_id=1028#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/?page_id=1028\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/?page_id=1028#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Property Landowners and Occupiers Liability and Duty of Care Ruling: Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/\",\"name\":\"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER\",\"description\":\"The NEWSLETTER\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/cropped-property-surveying-logo-for-newsletter-body-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/cropped-property-surveying-logo-for-newsletter-body-1.png\",\"width\":240,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\\\/newsletter\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/PropertySurveying\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Property Landowners and Occupiers Liability and Duty of Care Ruling: Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council - Property Surveying NEWSLETTER","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=1028","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Property Landowners and Occupiers Liability and Duty of Care Ruling: Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council - Property Surveying NEWSLETTER","og_description":"An important case has recently been heard by the Court of Appeal which has overturned an earlier ruling by the High Court. In the case Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council on 29 July 2010, in 2003 four students, including Mr Harvey who was 21 at the time, shared a taxi home after rugby and &hellip; Continue reading \"Property Landowners and Occupiers Liability and Duty of Care Ruling: Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council\"","og_url":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=1028","og_site_name":"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PropertySurveying","twitter_misc":{"Estimated reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=1028","url":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=1028","name":"Property Landowners and Occupiers Liability and Duty of Care Ruling: Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council - Property Surveying NEWSLETTER","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-25T14:01:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=1028#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=1028"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?page_id=1028#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Property Landowners and Occupiers Liability and Duty of Care Ruling: Jonathan Harvey v Plymouth City Council"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/","name":"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER","description":"The NEWSLETTER","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/#organization","name":"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER","url":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/wp-content\/uploads\/cropped-property-surveying-logo-for-newsletter-body-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/wp-content\/uploads\/cropped-property-surveying-logo-for-newsletter-body-1.png","width":240,"height":50,"caption":"Property Surveying NEWSLETTER"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PropertySurveying"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1028","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1028"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1028\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"folder","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.propertysurveying.co.uk\/newsletter\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ffolder&post=1028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}